Category: Strategy

Posted on

Writing Strategic Plans an Inside Job

Can someone from outside your company create your organization’s strategic plan? After all, if your future depends on the quality of this document, shouldn’t you hire an expert to do the job? At first glance, this makes sense, but as you contract with an outsider to execute the task, you may have misgivings.

As a consultant, I sometimes receive requests from potential clients (often via an RFP) to draft their strategic plan. It’s a bittersweet moment. While I’m happy to help, I also have a painful duty.

Now, I need to set about changing their mindset around the entire activity. Furthermore, I know something they don’t: these are non-negotiable. To be plain, if they refuse my efforts to change the definition of the project, I won’t work with them. What’s my reasoning for such a drastic demand?

  1. Strategic Plans Are Not Documents

While it’s the norm to equate a strategic plan with a document, the reality is quite different. It all has to do with where the document originates and what it’s intended to do.

The best plans lay out a very specific future. This is no 3-line vision statement with vague, undated aspirations which cannot be measured. Instead, it defines a detailed outcome and a realistic pathway to get there.

Ideally, its creation involves the top 10-18 leaders. Together, they seek to understand the current results and the external environment. Nowadays, this always includes the role of incipient and disruptive technology.

Once a baseline summary is created, a fresh, inspiring future can be defined. Usually, it’s selected from several possible candidates. Once the new vision is translated into numbers, it should be “backcasted” to the current year to produce a feasible

plan. This roadmap is converted into projects which are assigned to accountable individuals.

While there may be a document produced at the end of this process, it’s a poor facsimile of the hard conversations which preceded it. In retreats, we warn team members at the start: “Expect to make the 10 or so most difficult decisions needed to thrive in the future.”

Furthermore, they must do so with imperfect information. And they require courage to step into a world of uncertainty to declare a new Promised Land, even though they still live in Egypt.

As such, the document is optional – far less important than the final decisions, and the struggle to make them. Instead, the RFP I receive should focus on following rigorous, analytic steps as a team.

  1. There is No Real Delegation

However, there are companies in which the norm involves a CEO spending a weekend at a resort, locked away. During her hiatus, she writes the entire strategic plan. Her team receives the document on Monday morning.

One year, she may decide that she’s busy or needs outside input. She requests a quote from a consultant to perform the task instead. She explains: “My staff always agrees with the plan I come up with, and hardly give any comments. You should have no problem.”

When I share the bad news, she complains. “I just want you to write the plan, nothing else.” Is she making a mistake?

In a word, “Yes.” She hasn’t realized that her team has been left out of the process. Now, they are trained to give her “lip service.” They expect that by saying as little as possible, she’ll leave them to return to their operational, tactical jobs. Business as usual. They are “too busy to be distracted by strategic questions”, she complains.

By taking this path of least resistance, she makes a grave error. By relying on her strength alone, she under-estimates the need for their buy-in. Unless she’s in a tiny company, she actually needs them to do much more to succeed.

Instead, everyone in the leadership team should be engaged in crafting the strategic plan. This is the only way for the most important stakeholders to make challenging decisions. When she disappears for the weekend, she discounts their input.

Furthermore, she acts as if implementing the strategic plan involves no more than ordering people to play their part. This approach is far inferior to the alternative: involving the leadership team so that they can, in turn, engage others.

The bottom-line is, she’s been following a process that doesn’t work. Delegating it to an outsider only makes things worse.

If a consultant is employed, that may help. But the outside assistance shouldn’t diminish the challenge, it should only improve the experience and the final output.

True strategic planning, especially in these turbulent times, is no vacation-like exercise. It involves far more than prose. Instead, the stakes should always be high. The responsibility to confront tough choices and implement them lies with the leadership team.

Posted on

Why “Short-Term Strategy” is a Misnomer

Have you ever been stuck in a strategic planning session, complaining to yourself: “This is nothing more than a continuation of old, tired thoughts?” You need to intervene and somehow shift the level of thinking. But you don’t know what to say, and you certainly don’t want to make things worse. Do you suffer in silence? Or attempt to provide some leadership?

The truth is, you may already be someone who has been looking ahead and wondering why your company isn’t seeing the future the way you do. If you are, realize that this is uncommon. Most of your peers are fine going with the flow.

Want to be different? Don’t sit back waiting for a juicy, post-retreat “I told you so.” Instead, harness your commitment by challenging your team to think strategically. Here are some ways to steer the ship.

  1. Insist on planning for the long-term

Start by insisting that “strategies” are not the same as “tactics”. In this vein, there is no such thing as “short-term strategies”. Tactics should only exist to implement a strategic plan, which should always be long-term. While it’s entirely possible to engage in daily tactics without a strategy, it’s not likely to be sustainable. At some point, your lack of foresight will lead to actions which make things worse.

While some say they have a “long-term, 5-year strategy”, you should immediately object. Once again, there is no such thing. If asked, explain that a 5-year strategy is just a lazy extrapolation of past events, plus a few tweaks. It’s the easy way out – the path of least resistance.

However, this is the same thinking that dooms companies. There’s a reason GraceKennedy created a 25 year strategy in 1995 and subsequently left its competitors in the dust. Most can’t even remember who they were.

Remember Kodak? The reason Fuji (their arch-rivals) became a chemical company as Kodak went bankrupt is a case study in short verus long term thinking. In 2000, both were on top, but only 12 years later, Fuji’s pivot was paying off while Kodak was reaping the results of stale, tactical judgment.

The point of a long-term strategy is to future-proof the organization, and assure its ongoing success. That won’t come by restricting your thinking to the comfortable future, as Kodak did.

Instead, your company needs to look over the horizon and pick a destination. In other words, it must be like Columbus. Fellow sailors in the 1490s were afraid of sailing off the edge of the world. Today, managers are just as scared to craft plans too far into the future. Consequently, they limit their companies.

  1. Emphasize the next generation

Short-term planning also tends to be a selfish exercise, by default. After all, it’s only human to care about oneself first.

However, a team which creates outcomes 15-30 years in the future instantly turns on a switch. As if by magic, it automatically focuses on the next generation.

For example, a Caribbean company that intended to enter Latin America crafted big market-share goals. However, via detailed planning, they discovered they would need a headquarters in Miami. Over time, the corporation would become American.

After confronting this fact, they decided not to permanently disenfranchise future generations of Caribbean leaders. To keep the company in the region, they scaled back the plan significantly.

But even in the face of such useful thinking, some argue that technology is moving so fast that you can’t plan for it. However, in long-term planning sessions, teams learn that customer’s core needs don’t change. The only question they need to keep asking is, “How will they be fulfilled?”

In this context, technology changes the way customers’ unmet needs are addressed, so emerging innovations must be considered. But the overall goal of serving customers doesn’t change from one generation to the next.

Therefore, the main question to ask now is “Where is our company headed in the long-term, and what technologies and human capabilities should we invest in…today… in order to get there?” Good answers are hard to find, yet executive teams have no choice but to embrace the struggle. Why? In part, they will always have limited information. And disruptions have become a fact of life.

In the face of these limitations, you must still employ long-term thinking. As Churchill said, “Plans are of little importance, but planning is essential.”

The point of a long-term exercise is not to be correct. Or accurate. Instead, it’s to engage in the difficult planning and decision processes that can make or break an enterprise. As a participant in a session, it’s a worthy challenge to inspire your team to tackle.

Francis Wade is the author of Perfect Time-Based Productivity, a keynote speaker and a management consultant. To search his prior columns on productivity, strategy, engagement and business processes, send email to columns@fwconsulting.com.

Posted on

The Chief Strategy Officer in Mexico Study

If you happen to be a Chief Strategy Officer or someone in charge of the strategy function in your company, you may be looking for useful information to help you play the role.

But there’s not that much you can find with a simple search.

Here’s an exception – one which should appeal to Caribbean strategy professionals. Please share this with your colleagues across the region!

It outlines some interesting roles that CSO’s play, plus other findings that should impact the role of strategists in your company.

The Chief Strategy Office in Mexico – Report

Posted on

Strategy: Intentions or Predictions?

As a leader of your company, you may notice managers and board members struggling to be strategic. Trapped in low-level thinking, they habitually think micro when macro is needed. How do you help them craft inspiring visions that shift the way your organization operates?

At the start of each year, it’s only natural to aspire to be new, lofty and game-changing. As your followers look to you for direction, you know you need to say “something”. But the past couple of years may have led you to become cautious.

Perhaps your COVID-era plans now seem like bad jokes. You went out on a limb and called for big results, only to see them crushed. Today, you are gun-shy. You would be happy to exit 2022 without being forced to close your business. And if you don’t own a company, you just want to keep your job. It’s only natural to “small up” in the face of such realities.

However, these are exactly the fearful instincts that will turn out another Blockbuster Video, Nokia or Blackberry. They crashed out of industries they once dominated in a matter of years.

What do you need to do to lead your company effectively from the future rather than the past, even when your recent track record has been spotty?

  1. Stop Trying to Predict

By definition, a prediction is an extrapolation of the past. In stable, predictable times, you could use this tool to plan the future and your strategy.

But that’s exactly what you were taught. Your job as a manager was to produce results in the short term based on the recent past; tactical thinking that won’t help you when strategy is needed. Unfortunately, those days are over.

Now you must lead even if your prior predictions were terribly wrong, and you looked bad, foolish or stupid. Your natural tendency may be to think in shorter time-frames in order to make fewer mistakes.

As a leader crafting a fresh future, you need to stop predicting. Coming up with a new vision was never about making predictions and never will be.

  1. Replace Predictions with Intentions

The best strategic planning is about crafting intentions rather than predictions. They are always born in the future. Imagine a six-year-old saying “I want to be a doctor!” Good parents don’t scoff at such intentions, even though they aren’t based on facts.

However, the same child, if asked to predict, would probably say, “I want to keep playing with my toys!“

As an adult, you should gather all the facts you can muster. But at the end of the fact-finding, you must still craft an intention that is merely informed by the data, not limited by it. In other words, there will always be a risk when creating intentions which are meant to be ground-breaking, or transformational.

But what if your last few intentions produced nothing at all? What should you do then to be an effective leader?

  1. Close Out Prior Intentions and Craft New Ones

Even if recent efforts have failed, your organization still needs you to lead from the future. However, you could be hampered by your track record.

If so, consider bringing previous intentions to closure so your followers can hear a new one.

This may sound challenging or painful, but it isn’t. Simply take a critical mass of employees along a journey to explore the facts regarding the last failed intention. Doing so will lay the ground for whatever is coming next.

But be clear about your role. As a leader, you are the limiting factor. When you fail to create an effective, inspiring vision, don’t expect your managers to take up the slack. Their skills are limited.

However, as the leader, you have no excuse.

Your job is to get up in front of your staff each and every year with a vision of breakthrough results. When you shy away from doing so, you are dooming your organization. Don’t be surprised when it returns the favor with mediocre performance.

Seems impossible? If you can’t manage, get expert help. As the new year starts, your company needs you to be at your best, on top of your game. Call your personal development the recurring price to be paid by anyone who is in your position.

Also, you may need to train your managers and board members to think from the future, and be inspiring. At the very least, they should understand what a strategic vision is meant to do, so they don’t become obstacles.

But the buck stops with you. It’s your job to demonstrate that everyday management may be about predicting, but strategic leadership is about crafting inspiring intentions.

In summary, your people want to be led. As the occupant of an executive position, do your job.

Posted on

Becoming a Data-Focused Company

In the past few years, what opportunities has the shift to online business created for local companies? Your firm may be automating its processes, but is it also converting the data being collected into competitive advantage?

In 2003, I started a virtual organization: CaribHRForum. With less than 10 people at the start, it drew together HR practitioners I met in the Caribbean on various trips. New digital technologies were just emerging, and I believed they could be used to close the distance. Consequently, we adopted a centralized online mailing list to initiate a region-wide discussion.

The small group grew to add a website and a podcast – CaribHR.Radio. But the rapid growth outgrew the tools we were using and became overwhelming.

Thankfully, newer technology emerged in 2019 in the form of virtual community software – Mighty Networks. For the first time, an affordable, private internet platform could bring together thousands in the same space.

That same year, by coincidence, I apprenticed behind the scenes of a virtual conference. While I had been a speaker at prior events, now I learned how to host a summit or big event. It was a thrill, and I vowed to make it available to the members of CaribHRForum.

Then COVID-19 hit, and interest in online networks grew. It hasn’t stopped – CaribHRForum recently concluded its second virtual conference, one of the biggest in the region. With free registration, thousands are able to connect with HR experts, consultants and colleagues for the very first time.

But this is only the public side of the story. Hidden away from view, an important inner transformation based on data is also underway.

1) Industry Data Using Linkedin

What are the drivers of customer behaviour in your industry? You may want to have more than anecdotes to make decisions, but don’t have access to anything concrete.

We had the same problem, but the platforms we use have obliged by developing better data and analytic capabilities.

For example, on Linkedin we have learned that there are 23,000 HR professionals in the region, spread across 21 territories and countries.

By offering multiple Linkedin events on a range of topics, the platform tells us what this cohort is interested in learning. Our webinars and conferences advertised on the social network have served as a continuous pipeline. Each one adds new potential members. The cost? Just our time, as the network doesn’t charge for this service.

Furthermore, we have run paid Linkedin advertisements. While these are not cheap, they allow us to target each country’s HR Professionals with great precision. As such, we have steadily “trained” our Linkedin account to recognize people in our audience. Now, it’s a valuable tool: an analytic partner that outstrips our use of Instagram, Facebook and Google.

But the point is that they all offer data which gives us powerful insights into our efforts, and their results. They also track a storm of information on audience behaviour: views, clicks, and conversions which are impossible to gain from other face-to-face methods. Together, we can paint a picture that becomes clearer as they add new features.

2.) Community Behaviour Using Mighty Networks

While social networks have become great assets, our community platform on Mighty Networks has also improved its analytics. Now, we can track the overall behavior of our members as they transition from being newbies to more mature contributors.

From this data, we are able to predict which new topics are trending. From there, we can tweak the members’ journey and make timely improvements. As a result, we can better meet their overall purpose: to become better professionals. The data indicates which events and training we should offer.

3) The End Result: a New Organization

What else do all these data-driven insights allow for? Apart from the obvious internal benefits to us as hosts, they also enable more pluses for potential sponsors. As we uncover deeper interpretations, we offer sponsors more than exposure. Today, we can give them a better understanding of the audience and its unique behaviour.

In other words, the availability of analytics has transformed CaribHRForum. Scaling up from our small example, you may see how any organization can transform itself using data. The mere existence of this new information could be disruptive to an industry.

Perhaps your company is similar. You probably don’t intend for it to become a data-driven organization, but as you conduct more online business, consider this outcome. In fact, you may not have a choice.

The availability of fresh, easy-to-collect data in your industry could become a way for your company, or a competitor, to gain a permanent advantage. Don’t hesitate to include this likely scenario in your strategic planning.

Francis Wade is the author of Perfect Time-Based Productivity, a keynote speaker and a management consultant. To search prior columns on productivity, strategy, engagement and business processes, send email to columns@fwconsulting.com.

Posted on

Why “We’re Number One!” Goals Have Become Useless

In times past it was fashionable for corporate leaders to craft vision statements with commitments to be “number one” and “world class”. Lately, these have become less popular, with good reason. They are a sign of lackluster thinking which signals a lack of detailed planning.

Corporate leaders tend to fit a particular profile. They show strong Type A tendencies: energetic over-achievers who are time-sensitive and impatient. They drive themselves hard to accomplish great things, often bringing others behind them for the ride, ready or not.

However, if you have this trait, there may be an added one which gets you in trouble: your tendency to be competitive. If you get a lot of juice from beating other people, this approach works when goals are simple. It stirs up lots of extra effort and leads to reliable, continuous improvements.

Most CEO’s use this characteristic to grab the corner office ahead of others, at which point they often shift their focus to defeating other companies. This compulsion to be the captain of a winning team creates three kinds of problems.

Challenge #1 – CEO’s Play Games Employees Find Irrelevant

Part of being an effective executive involves learning the language of the C-Suite. Over time, this new lingo separates leaders from lower-level employees.

But the big problem is that what excites you, a Type A executive, is unlikely to inspire others. While staff knows there is a connection between EBITDA and their job security, it’s all a theory. Certainly, they feel no emotional bond.

As such, when you conduct a town hall you’re likely to speak glowingly of achievements in words that don’t resonate. You staffs’ needs are far more human, and it’s easy to lose track of them.

To build engagement, you’ll need to uncover employees’ actual aspirations, in order to satisfy them. For example, if getting their kids a decent education and making ends meet is a major part of their lives, you must start there.

Challenge #2 – CEO’s Craft Imaginary Competitions

The world is changing so rapidly that the old ways of thinking about competitors have become stale. In the past it was easier: ultra-competitive CEOs would find similar companies to compare themselves against. Then, they’d choose metrics such as profitability, stock price or revenue to be their yard-stick of accomplishment.

However, in a fast-changing landscape, your “competitors” are actually imaginary: made up. As industries and circumstances evolve, it becomes impossible to find other companies which are just like yours. There may be some overlap, but no perfect fit. Your orange ends up racing to a make-believe finish line against their apple.

As such, your claims to be (or plans to become) “Number One” are increasingly empty. They are a simplistic way to motivate yourself that may suit you, as a Type A executive, but no-one else.

Even aspirations to claim a “World-Class” standard look silly in today’s world. Anyone who cares can achieve this goal by defining a narrow standard. But even then, customers don’t care about such claims.

Challenge #3 – CEO’s Forsake Customers

While most MBA programmes are built around competition, that approach is becoming a distraction…at best a sideshow. It’s far better to develop a sharper focus on meeting customer’s unmet needs.

But this is no solid target. Customers’ needs are evolving due to new technologies so it’s become harder than ever to discover a customer’s “Job-to-be-Done”. (The term refers to the actions a customer takes to meet their unmet needs.)

The pandemic has led to shifts in many customers’ Jobs-to-be-Done, as they adopted new behavior patterns. Many companies unwittingly fell out of touch, and haven’t re-established a unique understanding. They run the risk of missing the mark.

Just observe the way Uber and AirBnB disrupted their respective industries before the pandemic. They used modern technology to tap into idle, low-cost resources (i.e. people’s cars and rooms). Now, they are shifting their processes to accommodate the new customer need for sanitized environments.

In short, they have been adjusting their companies’ business models, in concert with changes in their customers’ needs.

There are other ways your company can meet unmet needs, but when it happens, don’t be confused by your success. Definitely don’t claim it as proof of being “Number One” or “World Class” to start a new round of chest-beating.

Instead, use it as fuel to fire up a fresh cycle of customer research which, in the end, is the best insurance policy against disruptions of all kinds.

Francis Wade is the author of Perfect Time-Based Productivity, a keynote speaker and a management consultant. To search prior columns on productivity, strategy, engagement and business processes, send email to columns@fwconsulting.com

Posted on

Scheduling an Ordinary Strategic Planning Retreat? Cancel It.

Is your company preparing to conduct it’s customary annual retreat? You may want to scrap it and instead create a breakthrough event.

In the best of times, companies fall into a strategic planning rut. They follow the same routine each year, lulled into complacency by their accomplishments. The company’s leaders go through the motions, staying well within their comfort zones. Maybe this approach has worked for your company until now.

Consider the following: what if your pre-pandemic success occurred despite your lack of strategic planning? In other words, there could be other reasons your organization was successful. Perhaps the founders made smart choices, you exist as a monopoly or your competition is incompetent.

If you are “winning” over your competitors, there could still be a problem. Your entire industry might have lost its way and be under an invisible threat. Therefore, you could be renting video-tapes or making buggy-whips when the world is about to turn away from your offerings.

A very different approach to your strategic planning would be to start with the disruptions that COVID-19 has wrought. While it’s easy to fixate on the enormous obstacles on the road back to business as usual, here’s a thought experiment.

What if the pandemic were a room you have always lived in, with several doors? Suddenly, a number of them have opened while others have slammed shut. A few have remained the same.

Most companies are likely to treat this once-in-a-lifetime disruption as an obstacle to overcome. But what if you were to see it as a collection of doors: opportunities and dead-ends? If you were to do so, you may seize to chance to plan a new strategy in the following two ways.

1. A breakthrough event

Companies whose leaders long for a return to the “good old days” are the least likely to get themselves out of a strategic planning rut. They are probably accustomed to treating the activity as an everyday, low-stakes ritual. If this strikes a chord, use the opportunity to declare your next retreat, the one that creates proactive, game-changing plans.

While this may not be possible to achieve every year, there should be a clear distinction between major and minor opportunities. When there’s a big disruption, as there is now, go for a breakthrough retreat. If nothing much has changed, cancel the event. Pull out last year’s plan and perform some minor adjustments, showing your executives that there is a difference. But above all, make the decision early.

In the case of this particular pandemic, you probably may not have a choice. When multiple disruptions (e.g. health and economic) coincide, you must act differently. By design, move your leaders into a fresh zone of discomfort by putting them together in breakthrough planning sessions. Carefully arrange the activity so that a business-as-usual strategy becomes the most unlikely result.

This teaches your executives that all plans are not equal, and there are moments when a fresh initiative must be launched.

2. A technology refresh

Many executives prefer to have cozy, collegial retreats on the North Coast that resemble mini-vacations. However, important planning involves a series of difficult, high-stake conversations. They can be stressful, purposely throwing a spotlight on simmering disagreements.

When companies give in to the temptation to keep the peace, important decisions are just not made.

For example, many local firms still need to be convinced that the IT department should play a vital role in strategic planning. But this is understandable. Their ordinary IT employees may be preoccupied with issues such as laptop security. Big challenges like digital transformation remain out of reach. Consequently, it’s often difficult to incorporate IT, and doing so makes leaders uncomfortable.

However, today most agree that breakthrough strategic planning must include a view of technology. Unfortunately, it’s awkward to have digital transformation discussions at this level. Board and executive members are usually uninformed. But these vital discussions cannot be avoided.

In fact, the future will include more explorations of hard-to-understand technologies. Not less. And designing retreats to emphasize this reality has become mandatory. As such, your company must use long-term horizons of 10-30 years to take into account the full effect of new innovations.

This requirement frustrates many executives who find it painful to think in such terms. But planning for the distant future is essential in smashing the status quo with immediate actions.

If your organization doesn’t intend to produce a breakthrough plan at its next retreat, cancel it and modify your old one. Save your energy for when it’s really needed: a game-changing meeting of the minds that rethinks your company and industry. This activity could be the one that takes you into a new, unprecedented future.

Posted on

A CEO’s dilemma: having a great idea for a new strategy

If you’re the leader of an organization, what should you do when you develop an exciting, fresh strategic direction for your company? Before you rush in, take caution – you could do more bad than good if you don’t proceed carefully.

Imagine yourself as a CEO or MD, just returning from a two-day conference in New York. As you sit in the departure lounge, you’re filled with nervous energy. Three big ideas triggered by your exposure churn in your mind: your organization needs them to secure its survival in these trying times.

However, you also heard from a consultant who cautioned against implementing any new idea from the top down. If the implementation is complex, it’s easy for you to chase up the hill, only to realize that your troops aren’t behind you. How can you ensure that your business transforms in order to survive, while engaging staff at all levels along the way?

Would a town hall announcement do the trick?

The answer is usually “No.” As the leader, you must account for several gaps inherent in your leadership that could doom your effort. These must be accounted for in the way you roll out your ideas to ensure implementation.

Gap #1 – Your strategic thinking, versus that of others

Most CEO’s forget that while they are focusing on the company’s strategy 90% of the time, their direct staff is far less concerned. In my experience, the average leader wants managers who are short-term result-producers. As such, each manager spends no more than 10% of their time thinking about long-term strategy, triggered only by the advent of the annual retreat.

Therefore, managers develop strategic skills slowly, if at all. Consequently, many who are promoted to top positions end up floundering as they simply are not used to the long-term thinking needed to guide the enterprise.

This means that your bright, strategic idea might not be readily understood by your colleagues. While you came to these “sudden” insights based on your foreign exposure, it might take them much longer to arrive at the same conclusion. Therefore, you need to give them time to come up to speed, just to appreciate the nuances of your proposal. Don’t be impatient.

Gap #2 – Your executive’s engagement

While your top executives are used to managing their departments for quick results, they are probably not used to putting the hours into projects that have a long-term payoff. This can doom your strategy.

Most important strategic initiatives impact several departments at once. Also, the people who must implement them are usually far away from the CEO’s office. Therefore, top managers must have more than an abstract understanding; they need to show an emotional connection with the new project. That’s the only way to inspire those who need to set aside old behaviours and implement new ones.

Such executive bonds aren’t crafted via a town-hall speech, or by sending out messages on the importance of creating shareholder value. Instead, you must hold a commitment event – an occasion specifically intended to bring your top managers together in a public show of solidarity.

This usually takes place in a strategic planning retreat. By the time it concludes, each attendee has been asked to craft and engage with the new strategic plan. But it’s not a majority vote in which the losers are forced to sign up to something they don’t believe in.

Instead, there needs to be a sense that your three big ideas are self-evident: conclusions that any team of smart people would arrive at. As this happens, as the CEO, you must release any authorship of the original insights and allow others to build their own commitment, in their own words, for their own reasons.

Gap #3 – Their visible support

But this can’t be window dressing. Having everyone nod together is a start – the rubber hits the road when the plans hit the lower tiers of the organization. Now, leaders must engage staff so that they develop their own commitments as well, which cannot happen in an ordinary meeting.

The point of taking this circuitous route rather than just “issuing a directive” is that complex changes need the buy-in of many people who often don’t work together. The energy required to bring them to a single vision is considerable and doesn’t happen in an instant.

Don’t be fooled by those who offer instant assent. Instead, realize that success occurs only when staff members are applying private, discretionary time and effort.

This approach may not do much for the ego-driven CEO who is a magnet for credit and attention, but it’s the right one for the organization. In the long term, the best way to implement a new idea is through others.

Francis Wade is the author of Perfect Time-Based Productivity, a keynote speaker and a management consultant. To search prior columns on productivity, strategy, engagement and business processes, send email to columns@fwconsulting.com

Posted on

Why you need an after-McKinsey retreat

Prefer to listen to or view this article?

If your company is using an outside strategy consulting firm like McKinsey, what is the best step to take after they leave? If their expensive advice is so useful, why might you still require another planning meeting?

Many of the most successful companies around the world avail themselves of the research services provided by firms such as McKinsey & Co, Bain & Company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG). Their formula is often the same: a prospective client presents them with a difficult problem. To find solutions, they assemble a team of young, bright MBA’s who tackle the issue in an intense three to four-month sprint. Working long nights and weekends, they delve into their database of past projects and proprietary data, relying on the stellar advice of their global network of experts.

Compared to the internal resources of the typical client, they have an unmatched ability to bring a firehose of assistance to a threatening blaze.

However, don’t believe for a second that they are providing a complete solution to your troubles. Instead, their final presentation is actually just the start. Here’s why.

#1 – They Solve Narrow Problems

An outside expert isn’t geared to tackle a wide range of your company’s complex issues. They agree to focus on a sharp, well-defined scope: a tight problem definition that is clear to both sides. Given their brief tenure, they define problems that can actually be solved in a short timeframe.

Initially, it may seem strange to you, their client. The consultants appear to be trying to do less, actively resisting the temptation to do more. This sometimes lead to tensions. Some look at the huge price-tag (US$1-2 million) and believe that at that level, every issue should be resolved by their high-powered team.

But that’s not how it works, with good reason.

As expert problem-solvers, they operate a bit like surgeons. Within their narrow specialty, they are called into crisis situations to tackle your organization’s issues no-one else can. They represent an immediate investment of time and money to carry out a critical intervention. As such, it’s unprofitable and unwise for them to “boil the ocean”. Their value lies in their ability to go deep very quickly, not to understand a great deal of complexity.

That’s why, when their job is done, they need to walk away. They should never usurp the responsibility for the long-term health of the company. That should remain the primary job of you, the client. Likewise, the implementation of their recommendations should not be in their role.

#2 – Their Solutions Have an Expiry Date

An outside consultant’s advice might be the best possible answer to a given problem…right up until the date their intervention ends. After that, all bets are off.

Case in point: if COVID-19 has taught us anything, it’s the fact that dramatic disruptions do take place. Imagine if, after receiving a consultants’ report, a pandemic were to break out. The unfortunate timing could render the contents meaningless.

This is why it’s critical for clients to act on specific advice immediately, never allowing it to languish. Does this mean that they should rush to implement the suggestions without question?

#3 – Outside Experts Aren’t Your Company’s Primary Strategists

Ultimately, the fact is that consultants can’t understand the entirety of your business in just a few months. This means they shouldn’t become your organization’s chief strategists. That job remains in the executive team, led by the CEO.

Whether their recommendations confirm, deny or augment prior wisdom, your senior managers should consciously incorporate them into their thinking. But there’s a caveat. Not every recommendation they made is worth pursuing. Why? They simply cannot take into account all the factors necessary to lead your business into the future.

As such, the chances of their report being completely correct are low, especially in the areas in which they tend to be weak: cultural differences, human resources and change management. While their technical analysis might be on point, it won’t be perfect.

Turning their findings into something valuable requires some hard, additional work, regardless of the price-tag paid. Your team’s combined wisdom is needed to treat the expert advice as only a single input among many: an element of the organization’s strategic management, but never a replacement.

The final decisions remain in the hands of your executives. They must now plan a complete strategy, short and long term, that builds on the report. The first post-McKinsey meeting is therefore just the start of a new planning cycle, albeit one that has the advantage of some fresh insights.

This article was originally published in the Jamaica Gleaner.

Posted on

Why you need an after-McKinsey retreat

Prefer to listen to or view this article?

If your company is using an outside strategy consulting firm like McKinsey, what is the best step to take after they leave? If their expensive advice is so useful, why might you still require another planning meeting?

Many of the most successful companies around the world avail themselves of the research services provided by firms such as McKinsey & Co, Bain & Company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG). Their formula is often the same: a prospective client presents them with a difficult problem. To find solutions, they assemble a team of young, bright MBA’s who tackle the issue in an intense three to four-month sprint. Working long nights and weekends, they delve into their database of past projects and proprietary data, relying on the stellar advice of their global network of experts.

Compared to the internal resources of the typical client, they have an unmatched ability to bring a firehose of assistance to a threatening blaze.

However, don’t believe for a second that they are providing a complete solution to your troubles. Instead, their final presentation is actually just the start. Here’s why.

#1 – They Solve Narrow Problems

An outside expert isn’t geared to tackle a wide range of your company’s complex issues. They agree to focus on a sharp, well-defined scope: a tight problem definition that is clear to both sides. Given their brief tenure, they define problems that can actually be solved in a short timeframe.

Initially, it may seem strange to you, their client. The consultants appear to be trying to do less, actively resisting the temptation to do more. This sometimes lead to tensions. Some look at the huge price-tag (US$1-2 million) and believe that at that level, every issue should be resolved by their high-powered team.

But that’s not how it works, with good reason.

As expert problem-solvers, they operate a bit like surgeons. Within their narrow specialty, they are called into crisis situations to tackle your organization’s issues no-one else can. They represent an immediate investment of time and money to carry out a critical intervention. As such, it’s unprofitable and unwise for them to “boil the ocean”. Their value lies in their ability to go deep very quickly, not to understand a great deal of complexity.

That’s why, when their job is done, they need to walk away. They should never usurp the responsibility for the long-term health of the company. That should remain the primary job of you, the client. Likewise, the implementation of their recommendations should not be in their role.

#2 – Their Solutions Have an Expiry Date

An outside consultant’s advice might be the best possible answer to a given problem…right up until the date their intervention ends. After that, all bets are off.

Case in point: if COVID-19 has taught us anything, it’s the fact that dramatic disruptions do take place. Imagine if, after receiving a consultants’ report, a pandemic were to break out. The unfortunate timing could render the contents meaningless.

This is why it’s critical for clients to act on specific advice immediately, never allowing it to languish. Does this mean that they should rush to implement the suggestions without question?

#3 – Outside Experts Aren’t Your Company’s Primary Strategists

Ultimately, the fact is that consultants can’t understand the entirety of your business in just a few months. This means they shouldn’t become your organization’s chief strategists. That job remains in the executive team, led by the CEO.

Whether their recommendations confirm, deny or augment prior wisdom, your senior managers should consciously incorporate them into their thinking. But there’s a caveat. Not every recommendation they made is worth pursuing. Why? They simply cannot take into account all the factors necessary to lead your business into the future.

As such, the chances of their report being completely correct are low, especially in the areas in which they tend to be weak: cultural differences, human resources and change management. While their technical analysis might be on point, it won’t be perfect.

Turning their findings into something valuable requires some hard, additional work, regardless of the price-tag paid. Your team’s combined wisdom is needed to treat the expert advice as only a single input among many: an element of the organization’s strategic management, but never a replacement.

The final decisions remain in the hands of your executives. They must now plan a complete strategy, short and long term, that builds on the report. The first post-McKinsey meeting is therefore just the start of a new planning cycle, albeit one that has the advantage of some fresh insights.

This article was originally published in the Jamaica Gleaner.